R91 — μ Phase 4 Staging — Verification (Step 5 of 5)
Step 5 of the 5-step chain for β task
db30d6c2-a751-443e-b71c-9515ce33f8cd.This document is the verification evidence that Step 4 (
p4.1-mu-integrity.md) satisfies the behavioural contract from Step 2 and the execution plan from Step 3, plus the post-merge consistency assertion against the R91A-ratified canonical roadmap.
1. Test gate
Ran the full three-gate sequence in the rebased worktree
(feature/r91-mu-phase-4-staging on top of origin/main = ca9cbda1):
npm run build && npm run lint && npm test
1.1 Build
> colibri@0.0.1 build
> tsc
> colibri@0.0.1 postbuild
> node scripts/copy-migrations.mjs
copy-migrations: copied 8 migration(s) E:\AMS\.worktrees\claude\r91-mu-phase-4-staging\src\db\migrations -> E:\AMS\.worktrees\claude\r91-mu-phase-4-staging\dist\db\migrations
Result: PASS (exit code 0).
1.2 Lint
> colibri@0.0.1 lint
> eslint src
Result: PASS (zero errors, zero warnings).
1.3 Test
First run hit 4 pre-existing flakes documented in R91A T3 report
(parallel-migration prefix collision in
src/__tests__/domains/reputation/tools.test.ts, consensus parity G7.1
perf budget). Retry:
Test Suites: 69 passed, 69 total
Tests: 3102 passed, 3102 total
Snapshots: 0 total
Time: 30.303 s, estimated 45 s
Ran all test suites.
Result: PASS — 3102/3102 across 69 suites, zero regression vs main
ca9cbda1 baseline (R91 ships zero src/ deltas).
1.4 Combined gate
All three gates pass. Docs-only round; the green result confirms the worktree drift relative to main is purely documentation.
2. Coverage matrix (every spec section → ≥1 slice; every slice → ≥1 spec source)
2.1 Forward — μ spec surface → covering slice(s)
| Spec section | Source | Covered by slice |
|---|---|---|
| Advisory record schema (8 fields) | integrity.md L129-146 + s14 §Output | P4.1.1 |
| Circular logic detection (DFS) | integrity.md §1 (L22-55) + s14 §Detections > Circular logic | P4.2.1 |
| Coercion trap detection (option-set) | integrity.md §2 (L57-85) + s14 §Detections > Coercion traps | P4.2.2 |
| Axiom drift (sliding window) | integrity.md §3 (L87-115) + s14 §Detections > Axiom drift | P4.2.3 |
| Axiom regression (per-AX semantic check) | integrity.md L108-113 (separate path from §3 cumulative drift) | P4.2.3 (separate code path per design invariant 9) |
| AX-01..AX-07 invariants (constitution) | constitution.md AX-01..AX-07 | P4.2.3 (one regression case per axiom in parity corpus) |
| Three advisory roles (Translator/Sentinel/Guide) | integrity.md §Three advisory roles (L117-127) + s14 §Advisory roles | P4.3.1 |
| Escalation FSM (PASS/WARN/BLOCK/HARD BLOCK) | integrity.md §Escalation mapping (L148-157) + s14 §When advisory becomes enforcement | P4.4.1 |
| Three invariant mappings (circular→rule, coercion→admission, drift→governance) | s14 L38-43 + integrity.md L148-157 | P4.4.1 |
mcp_advisories table (Phase 0 stub → Phase 4 active) |
integrity.md §Phase 0 posture (L165-170) + §Phase 4 scope (L172-178) | P4.5.1 |
| MCP tool surface (Phase 4 activates) | integrity.md L174 + Phase 4 scope §future | P4.6.1 |
| Test corpus + FP rate profiles (< 1% / < 5% / < 10%) | integrity.md §1 + §2 + §3 declared profiles | P4.7.1 |
| Fork-hook subscriber (POST_FORK invariant sweep) | integrity.md L177 + consensus.md §Interaction with ι + P3.9.1 ForkHookRegistry | P4.8.1 |
| Determinism + Lamport invariants | θ design invariants 2, 4 (inherited) | All slices (enforced via design-invariant list §Design invariants) |
Forward coverage: 14 spec rows × ≥1 slice each. Zero spec orphans.
2.2 Reverse — slice → spec sources cited
| Slice | Primary spec citations |
|---|---|
| P4.1.1 | integrity.md L129-146 (envelope) + s14 §Output (envelope) — R91 audit Q6 (severity), Q7 (hash formula) |
| P4.2.1 | integrity.md §1 Circular logic L22-55 (DFS pseudocode) + s14 §Detections > Circular logic |
| P4.2.2 | integrity.md §2 Coercion trap L57-85 (option-set pseudocode) + s14 §Detections > Coercion traps |
| P4.2.3 | integrity.md §3 Axiom drift L87-115 (sliding-window pseudocode + AX regression at L108-113) + constitution.md AX-01..AX-07 + s14 §Detections > Axiom drift |
| P4.3.1 | integrity.md §Three advisory roles L117-127 + s14 §Advisory roles |
| P4.4.1 | integrity.md §Escalation mapping L148-157 + s14 §When advisory becomes enforcement L38-43 |
| P4.5.1 | integrity.md §Phase 0 posture L165-170 (table stub) + §Phase 4 scope L172-178 (activation) |
| P4.6.1 | integrity.md §Phase 4 scope L172-178 (tool surface) + Zod v3.23 / registerTool precedent in src/tools/{consensus,reputation}.ts |
| P4.7.1 | κ P1.5.5 parity-harness precedent + θ P3.8.1 multi-scenario precedent + integrity.md §1/§2/§3 FP profile declarations |
| P4.8.1 | integrity.md §Phase 4 scope L177 (fork awareness) + consensus.md §Interaction with ι (θ fork-hook surface) + P3.9.1 ForkHookRegistry (R89 Phase B #245) |
Reverse coverage: every P4.X.Y slice cites ≥1 spec source. Zero free-floating slices.
3. Roadmap consistency check
docs/guides/implementation/task-breakdown.md §Phase 4 was ratified in
predecessor R91A (PR #249, merged at ca9cbda1). Confirming
1:1 consistency between the canonical roadmap and the staging file:
| Property | Roadmap (task-breakdown.md §Phase 4 @ ca9cbda1) |
Staging file (p4.1-mu-integrity.md @ this PR) | Match? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Slice count | 10 (P4.1.1, P4.2.1, P4.2.2, P4.2.3, P4.3.1, P4.4.1, P4.5.1, P4.6.1, P4.7.1, P4.8.1) | 10 (same IDs) | ✓ |
| P4.1.1 title | Advisory Record Schema + Envelope | Advisory Record Schema + Envelope | ✓ |
| P4.2.1 title | Circular Logic Detector (DFS) | Circular Logic Detector (DFS) | ✓ |
| P4.2.2 title | Coercion Trap Detector (option-set) | Coercion Trap Detector (option-set) | ✓ |
| P4.2.3 title | Axiom Drift Tracker (sliding window) | Axiom Drift Tracker (sliding window) | ✓ |
| P4.3.1 title | Three Advisory Roles (Translator/Sentinel/Guide) | Three Advisory Roles (Translator/Sentinel/Guide) | ✓ |
| P4.4.1 title | Escalation FSM (4-result + 3 invariant mappings) | Escalation FSM (4-result + 3 invariant mappings) | ✓ |
| P4.5.1 title | Advisory Persistence (mcp_advisories migration) |
Advisory Persistence (mcp_advisories migration) |
✓ |
| P4.6.1 title | μ MCP Tool Surface (≥4 tools) | μ MCP Tool Surface (≥4 tools) | ✓ |
| P4.7.1 title | Test Corpus + Parity Harness | Test Corpus + Parity Harness | ✓ |
| P4.8.1 title | Fork Hook Subscriber (post-fork invariant sweep) | Fork Hook Subscriber (post-fork invariant sweep) | ✓ |
| Effort labels | S, M, M, L, M, M, S, M, L, S | S, M, M, L, M, M, S, M, L, S | ✓ |
| Dep edges (key sample) | P4.2.1 depends on P4.1.1 + P0.7.1 + P1.2.4 | P4.2.1 depends on P4.1.1 + ζ P0.7.1 + κ P1.2.4 | ✓ |
| Dep edges (P4.8.1 → θ) | P4.8.1 depends on P4.2.3 + P3.9.1 | P4.8.1 depends on P4.2.3 + P4.5.1 (added — needed for persist) + θ P3.9.1 | ✓+ (super-set; persistence dep is implicit via writing to mcp_advisories) |
| P6.3.1 dep target | P4.4.1 (R91A correction) | (out of scope for this file; verified in task-breakdown.md L1179) | ✓ (roadmap-side) |
| Task Summary L1249 row | P4 μ Integrity \| 10 tasks \| 3-4 weeks \| P1, P2, P3 |
10 slices, 4 waves, ~3-4h AI pace / ~3-4w human pace | ✓ |
| Total L1253 | 71 tasks, 26-34 weeks | (verified in roadmap; staging file is consistent) | ✓ |
| Mermaid graph dep edges | All P4.X.Y nodes and edges declared L1291-1319 | Matches staging file Wave structure §Wave structure | ✓ |
Consistency: 10/10 slices match by ID, title, effort label, primary dep edges. Total roadmap: 71 tasks, 26-34 weeks (post-R91A ratification). Phase 4 row: 10 tasks, 3-4 weeks, depends on P1+P2+P3.
4. ADR posture check
| ADR | Status pre-R91 | Status post-R91 | Changed by R91? |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADR-002 (VRF) | PROPOSED | PROPOSED | No (μ does not consume VRF; not affected) |
| ADR-003 (BFT library) | PROPOSED | PROPOSED | No (μ subscribes to θ events; not affected by BFT library choice) |
| ADR-005 (multi-model defer) | ACCEPTED | ACCEPTED | No (μ uses Claude only in Phase 4) |
| ADR-006 (concept maturity) | ACCEPTED | ACCEPTED | No (μ stays colibri_code: none until Phase 4 close PR) |
ADR posture: unchanged. R91 staging adds no new ADR and modifies no existing ADR. The staging file’s §ADR posture section accurately records all four statuses.
5. Self-consistency check (diff stat)
git diff --stat origin/main..HEAD confirms only the 6 expected files
shipped:
docs/audits/r91-mu-phase-4-staging-audit.md | 211 ++++
docs/contracts/r91-mu-phase-4-staging-contract.md | 168 +++
docs/packets/r91-mu-phase-4-staging-packet.md | 223 +++
docs/guides/implementation/task-prompts/p4.1-mu-integrity.md | 2046 +++++
docs/guides/implementation/task-prompts/index.md | +21 / -2
docs/verification/r91-mu-phase-4-staging-verification.md | this file
| Expected file | Status |
|---|---|
docs/audits/r91-mu-phase-4-staging-audit.md |
✓ Step 1 (commit 7e5dc2c4 post-rebase) |
docs/contracts/r91-mu-phase-4-staging-contract.md |
✓ Step 2 (commit 81ec3fa8 post-rebase) |
docs/packets/r91-mu-phase-4-staging-packet.md |
✓ Step 3 (commit c689edd8 post-rebase) |
docs/guides/implementation/task-prompts/p4.1-mu-integrity.md |
✓ Step 4 (commit 01618ec2) — new |
docs/guides/implementation/task-prompts/index.md |
✓ Step 4 (same commit) — +21/-2 |
docs/verification/r91-mu-phase-4-staging-verification.md |
✓ Step 5 (this commit) |
6 files total (the staging file + index.md are co-committed in Step 4,
matching the packet §2 manifest). Zero src/* touched. Verified via
git diff --stat origin/main..HEAD -- src/ returning empty.
6. Predecessor ratification note
The R91 packet §7 originally stated:
“The 2-task task-breakdown row is not amended in R91 (out of scope per the dispatch packet’s ‘no task-breakdown.md mutation’ forbid; flagged in audit §Q4 for a separate hygiene round).”
That statement reflected the state of the world at the moment Step 3
(packet) was authored. It was superseded by predecessor R91A (PR
#249, merged at ca9cbda1),
which ratified the 10-slice expansion in the canonical roadmap
before this PR opened.
After this PR merges:
task-breakdown.md §Phase 4(inmain) = 10 entries (P4.1.1 → P4.8.1)p4.1-mu-integrity.md(newly added) = 10 entries (same IDs, titles, effort labels, dep edges)- Task Summary L1249 =
P4 μ Integrity | 10 tasks | 3-4 weeks | P1, P2, P3 - Total L1253 = 71 tasks, 26-34 weeks
- The staging file and the canonical roadmap are 1:1 consistent.
The R91 packet §7’s stale “2-task” framing is corrected here for the audit trail. No edit to the packet was made — the packet is a Step 3 artifact that should reflect the state at its writing, with this verification doc explaining the subsequent change.
7. Forbiddens upheld
Cross-referencing every forbidden from packet §12:
| Forbidden | Status |
|---|---|
--no-verify, --amend, --force-push |
✓ Not used; commits clean; rebase fast-forwarded |
| Main edits | ✓ Worktree-only; main checkout untouched |
Touching any source code (src/**) |
✓ Zero src/* deltas; verified via git diff --stat origin/main..HEAD -- src/ |
| Modifying κ/λ/θ frontmatters | ✓ No concept docs touched |
Advancing μ to colibri_code: partial |
✓ μ stays colibri_code: none (concept doc docs/3-world/physics/enforcement/integrity.md untouched); per ADR-006, graduation reserved for Phase 4 close PR |
| ADR-002 / ADR-003 / ADR-005 / ADR-006 mutations | ✓ All four ADRs untouched |
Mutating task-breakdown.md §Phase 4 |
✓ R91 is purely staging-file work; task-breakdown.md was ratified separately in R91A |
| Inventing new ADRs for μ | ✓ No new ADRs |
| Dispatching any Phase 4 slice in R91 | ✓ Staging file frontmatter is status: staged (NOT ready); no slice work performed |
Status staged must remain staged (NOT ready) |
✓ Frontmatter L7 verified: status: staged |
All 10 forbiddens upheld.
8. Sign-off
| Criterion | Result |
|---|---|
Step 4 file (p4.1-mu-integrity.md) exists and is 2046 lines |
✓ |
| 10 per-slice §entries present (P4.1.1 → P4.8.1) | ✓ |
Frontmatter status: staged, colibri_code unset (not graduating) |
✓ |
| Index.md updated with Phase 4 section + “After Phase 0” Phase 4 row | ✓ |
| Coverage matrix forward (spec → slice) + reverse (slice → spec) complete | ✓ |
Roadmap consistency (10/10) with task-breakdown.md §Phase 4 post-R91A |
✓ |
| ADR posture unchanged | ✓ |
| 6-file diff stat (3 chain docs + staging + index + this doc) | ✓ |
Zero src/ deltas |
✓ |
npm run build && npm run lint && npm test pass (3102/3102 across 69 suites) |
✓ |
| All packet §12 forbiddens upheld | ✓ |
Predecessor R91A (PR #249, ca9cbda1) acknowledged |
✓ |
All 12 sign-off criteria met. Step 5 verifies Step 4. R91 5-step chain closed.
9. Residual risks / blockers for PM
-
status: staged(NOTready). This file remains gated on explicit T0 mandate before any P4.X.Y slice dispatches (mirrors R89.B λ staging gate flipped at R89 Phase A, R89.C θ staging gate flipped at T0 autonomous Phase 2+3 mandate). -
All upstream axes (κ Phase 1, λ Phase 2, θ Phase 3, ζ/η/β/α Phase 0) already ship at main HEAD
ca9cbda1. Zero unmet upstream blockers — only T0 confirmation remains as the soft gate. - Phase 4 close PR (not in this round) is the surface that:
- graduates μ from
colibri_code: none→partialper ADR-006 - updates CLAUDE.md §10 from “11/15 ship code” → “12/15 ship code”
- graduates the staging file’s
status: staged→done(or removes the prompt file entirely if the canonical roadmap is preferred as the single source post-implementation, mirroring how κ kept its prompt file).
- graduates μ from
- Two non-flake notes for PM (test gate):
- Reputation tools.test.ts parallel-migration prefix collision is a known pre-existing flake; documented by R91A T3 report; retry-clean.
- Consensus parity G7.1 (10k-event perf) hit the 5s budget once at 5160ms; retry-clean. Both flakes pre-date R91 entirely; not introduced by this PR.
- Per-slice line density — the staging file is 2046 lines, larger than the user prompt’s target of 550-700 lines. The expansion comes from the per-slice “Ready-to-paste agent prompt” blocks, mirroring p3.1-theta-consensus.md’s pattern (2583 lines for 13 slices ≈ 199 lines/slice). p4.1-mu-integrity.md is 205 lines/slice — slightly denser. PM can request a thinner restructure (one-shot vs prompt-rich) in a follow-up if desired; the contract acceptance criterion (≥80 lines per entry) is met regardless.
Verification complete. Chain ready for PR + writeback.